Hermione's Bookshelf

RSS

Posts tagged with "movies"

the-ruin-of-the-nephilim:

hey now we all have a new game to play:

Is it a TFIOS or Divergent edit?

sodamnrelatable:

I bet Spiderman left New York City for a day trip and when he came back, he saw the catastrophic aftermath of The Avengers and he was like

“I WAS GONE FOR ONE DAY. ONE DAY.” 

image

(Source: samandriel)

Apr 2

lockedin221b:

candoramity:

You know what I’m grateful for? That they never made movie covers for the Harry Potter books. Can we all just take a moment to appreciate that?

image

[Image shows Hogwarts students standing up and clapping in the Great Hall.]

#I was so happy that they did not make movie covers. #Seriously. #Because, ultimately, it’s about the books for me.

"How Hollywood De-fanged Potter's Radical Politics Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 1: more than a movie review" (by Megan)

http://www.mugglenet.com/editorials/defangedpotter.shtml

I read this essay a while ago, and it’s really excellent. Megan points out how the movies removed important aspects of the book, resulting in films that did not show the same important messages that were in the originals.

This essay serves as an excellent response to the claim that fans complain to much about little details that were changed. In reality, it’s not just little details that were changed, but very important things in the story.

shorm:

If you think that representation doesn’t matter, that’s probably because you’re already represented.

for each harry potter title which is better, the book or the movie?

The books are better for each title.

Reblog this if a fictional book series or movie has made a difference in your life.

ask-the-tooth-fairy:

I’m gonna prove my mom wrong.

Of all the varieties of irritating comment out there, the absolute most annoying has to be “Why can’t you just watch the movie for what it is??? Why can’t you just enjoy it? Why do you have to analyze it???”

If you have posted such a comment, or if you are about to post such a comment, here or anywhere else, let me just advise you: Shut up. Shut the fuck up. Shut your goddamn fucking mouth. SHUT. UP.

First of all, when we analyze art, when we look for deeper meaning in it, we are enjoying it for what it is. Because that is one of the things about art, be it highbrow, lowbrow, mainstream, or avant-garde: Some sort of thought went into its making — even if the thought was, “I’m going to do this as thoughtlessly as possible”! — and as a result, some sort of thought can be gotten from its reception. That is why, among other things, artists (including, for instance, James Cameron) really like to talk about their work.

Now, that doesn’t mean you have to think about a work of art. I don’t know anyone who thinks every work they encounter ought to only be enjoyed through conscious, active analysis — or if I do, they’re pretty annoying themselves. And I know many people who prefer not to think about much of what they consume, and with them I have no argument. I also have no argument with people who disagree with another person’s thoughts about a work of art. That should go without saying. Finally, this should also go without saying, but since it apparently doesn’t: Believe me, the person who is annoying you so much by thinking about the art? They have already considered your revolutionary “just enjoy it” strategy, because it is not actually revolutionary at all. It is the default state for most of humanity.

So when you go out of your way to suggest that people should be thinking less — that not using one’s capacity for reason is an admirable position to take, and one that should be actively advocated — you are not saying anything particularly intelligent. And unless you live on a parallel version of Earth where too many people are thinking too deeply and critically about the world around them and what’s going on in their own heads, you’re not helping anything; on the contrary, you’re acting as an advocate for entropy.

And most annoyingly of all, you’re contributing to the fucking conversation yourselves when you make your stupid, stupid comments. You are basically saying, “I think people shouldn’t think so much and share their thoughts, that’s my thought that I have to share.” If you really think people should just enjoy the movie without thinking about it, then why the fuck did you (1) click on the post in the first place, and (2) bother to leave a comment? If it bugs you so much, GO WATCH A GODDAMN FUNNY CAT VIDEO.

-

Moff’s Law

#This #Yes, it is important to analyze what we read and watch and listen to. #Yes, discussing equality and how people are portrayed (or not portrayed) in a story is important. #Yes, it matters because our stories reflect ideas that are present in our minds and societies and these stories then go on to affect those societies and change them. #Yes, it matters, because these stories affect us and become an important part of our lives.

-

Acknowledgements:

Quoted from Racialicious: http://www.racialicious.com/2009/12/21/and-we-shall-call-this-moffs-law/

Found via Geek Feminism wiki: http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Moff’s_law

Via io9: http://io9.com/5978437/what-ive-learned-from-5-years-of-arguing-on-the-internet

Via Greta Christina’s Blog: http://freethoughtblogs.com/greta/2013/01/24/when-half-the-atheosphere-dogpiles-on-you/

anondracomalfoy:

bless you if you can admit your favorite character has flaws.

How media clearly reflects the sexism and the racism we...

damegreywulf:

How media clearly reflects the sexism and the racism we cannot see in ourselves.

glamaphonic:

I wanted my first-year film students to understand what happens to a story when actual human beings inhabit your characters, and the way they can inspire storytelling. And I…

(Source: letthetruthlaugh)